entropytown @2026 / Twitter (X) / About / Subscribe

About

A Small Manifesto

entropytown is a publication about technology, but not in the trade-show sense. The point is to look at software, machines and markets as cultural objects with invoices attached.

entropytown writes about AI, infrastructure, devices, security, regulation and the quieter bureaucracies that decide how technology enters ordinary life. The working assumption is that software is never merely software. It is also a theory of labour, a business model, a permissions structure, and a small argument about who is expected to adapt to whom.

A product is also a social theory.

The interesting question is rarely just whether a system works. It is what sort of institution it presumes, what fantasy it flatters, and which chores it quietly moves onto someone else. A chatbot may also be a management diagram. A browser may also be an ad strategy. A local agent may also be a dream of purchasing labour without the inconvenience of labourers.

The gap between rhetoric and plumbing is usually the story.

Founders sell inevitability. Engineers ship compromises. Investors fund categories that sound larger than they are. We are interested in the distance between the deck and the deployment: the container behind the demo, the subsidy behind the growth curve, the benchmark that turns out to be a mood board with numbers attached.

Security is not an appendix reserved for later.

When a product requires broad permissions, loose containment and a tactful silence about blast radius, that is not a regrettable wrinkle after launch. It is part of the product definition. The attack surface is often the most candid description of what the system has been asked to become.

History remains useful because the industry keeps renaming old appetites.

Much of what passes for novelty is an older economic desire in fresher tailoring: frictionless leverage, ambient automation, cheap content, cheap labour, a machine that supposedly works while its owner sleeps. It helps to know the lineage. The technology may change. The pitch is often merely being asked to wear a new tie.

The aim is not contrarianism. It is proportion.

Some systems are genuinely useful. Some are merely well narrated. Most are a mixture of both. The job here is to describe the thing plainly: what it does, what it costs, what fantasy it sells, and why otherwise sensible people are tempted to believe it. That requires curiosity, context and, from time to time, a mildly unfriendly sentence.

If that sounds agreeable, the subscription page is just next door.